To pay or not to pay, that is the question

For taxpayers that make estimated tax payments throughout the year, the payment for the fourth quarter is due on January 15 of the next year. Even though this payment is made in the following year, it is still credited as a payment for the tax year in which it applies. But, if the taxpayer lives in an "income tax state" (a state with its own income tax, like Arkansas or Louisiana, but not Texas) and makes estimated tax payments to the state, there is a catch to when these payments are deductible on a Federal return.

Allowable itemized deductions for individuals on a Federal 1040 include state and local taxes paid. These taxes include income, real estate, and personal property taxes as well as some other taxes paid to a state or local government. The deductible portion of these taxes is the amount actually paid during the year, not amounts assessed or paid in other years. Here are a few examples:

Bob, who does not live in an income tax state, pays his personal property taxes for 2012 in October of 2013 for $500. At the same time, he receives his assessment for 2013 of $600 which will be due in October 2014. Bob's deduction for personal property taxes in 2013 is $500, because that is what he actually paid even though it was related to the previous year.  The $600 will be deductible to him in 2014 when it is paid.

Peggy lives in an income tax state and makes state estimated tax payments quarterly. In January 2013, she made her 4th quarter payment for 2012 for $500. Then, in April, June, and September of 2013 and in January 2014 she made quarterly payments of $600 each for her 2013 state taxes. Peggy's state tax deduction on her Federal return for 2013 is $2,300 ($500 + 3 $600 payments) which is the total of the payments made during 2013, even though one of them was related to a previous year.

This example leads us to the point of this article. If Peggy makes her state fourth quarter payment for 2013 in December 2013 instead of January 2014, her state tax deduction on her Federal return will be $2,900 instead of $2,300. As a result, her Federal tax liability would be decreased slightly because of the added deduction. It is for this reason that taxpayers living in income tax states should always consider paying their final estimated tax payment before the end of the year.

But, as is usually the case, there are caveats with this plan - the Alternative Minimum Tax and the time value of money.

Taxpayers subject to the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) will not realize the benefit of paying their state estimated tax payment early because those payments will be added back as a preference item on Form 6251.  Therefore if taxpayers are close to or already subject to the AMT, they should make their payments as scheduled (not early).

Taxpayers must also consider the time value of money when paying estimated tax payments early.  For example, if the funds needed to make the estimated tax payment will be accessed by selling investments at a gain, then the net effect of the transaction might be zero because the additional benefit from the payment could be offset by the additional income recognized from selling the investments in the same year.  Furthermore, the funds used to pay taxes earlier by 15-30 days may lose investment earnings which could be large if the estimated tax payment is large.

In closing, taxpayers should consider making their 4th quarter state estimated tax payment in December (now!) as long as they are not subject to the AMT and they have liquid funds to make the payment without creating additional income.

The not-so-Alternative Minimum Tax, Part 1

The Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) for individuals, enacted by Congress in 1969, is becoming less of an alternative for some taxpayers.  The AMT was originally targeted at approximately 150 taxpayers that had high adjusted gross income (AGI), but paid zero tax due to the types of income and structuring of deductions.  In effect, under the current structure the AMT almost guarantees that once taxpayers reach a certain level of income, their effective tax rate will be at least 26% or higher.

The AMT is calculated by both businesses and individuals, but under different circumstances.  This post will discuss the AMT as it applies to individuals.

Individuals subject to AMT

Individuals calculate their share of the AMT on Form 6251.  That taxpayer begins with their AGI after itemized deductions, and then adds back the following:

• Medical expenses
• State and local income, real estate, and property taxes
• Miscellaneous deductions

The taxpayer must also add back or reduce by the difference between their income tax and AMT amounts for the following:

• Investment interest expense
• Depletion
• Basis in exercised incentive stock options
• Depreciation expense

Taxpayers may also have to report AMT adjustments passed through on K-1's from their other activities (partnerships, trusts, or S-corporations).

Once all of these adjustments have been considered, the taxpayer arrives at their alternative minimum taxable income (AMTI).  Taxpayers are allowed an exemption amount, which has been indexed for inflation thanks to acts by Congress at the end of 2012.  This exemption amount is $51,900 S / $80,800 MFJ for 2013.  The exemption amount is subtracted from AMTI, and the resulting amount is multiplied by either 26% or 28% depending on whether the amount is above or below $179,500 MFJ / $89,750 S.   If income is above that amount, it is multiplied by 28%, and 26% if not.

Once the AMT is calculated, it is compared to the regular tax calculated on the taxpayer's Form 1040.  This is where the AMT earns the name "alternative": once the taxpayer compares their AMT to their regular tax, the higher amount becomes their income tax.

Why?

Why does the AMT work?  Because it attacks two types of tax situations and makes them less beneficial.

First, the AMT true's up the tax rate for taxpayers that have high incomes from sources that are not taxed at regular tax rates, such as long-term capital gains, qualified dividends, and tax-exempt interest.  If a taxpayer has $10 million in AGI, but it consists completely of long-term capital gains and qualified dividends, their tax rate is only 15% (20% in 2013) as opposed to 35% (39.6% in 2013).  The AMT would require this taxpayer to pay a higher rate due to their high income.

Second, the AMT penalizes taxpayers with certain higher-than-normal deductions.  As mentioned above, one deduction added back for AMT purposes is state and local taxes from Schedule A.  For a taxpayer living in an income tax state (a state that has their own income tax, such as Arkansas or Louisiana, but not Texas), a deduction is allowed on their Federal return for state tax payments made during the calendar year.  The difference between paying the state 4th quarter estimated tax payment on Dec 31 instead of Jan 15 of the following year is that the payment will be allowed as a deduction Schedule A in the year of payment.  However, making that payment before year-end will not matter if the taxpayer will be subject to AMT, because those amounts will be added back.

Can it be avoided?

Unfortunately, the AMT is a "do not pass go, do not collect $200" situation.  One simple way to forego the calculation is for the taxpayer's income after itemized deductions to stay below the AMT exemption amounts.  Also, if the majority of the taxpayer's income is taxed at regular rates, the AMT will not be a problem because the regular tax will most likely exceed the AMT.  If a taxpayer, because of their types of income, will be subject to the AMT, they should try to avoid certain deductions (if possible) in order to minimize their AMTI.  Simple planning maneuvers such as paying state taxes on Jan 15 of the following year and staggering the exercise of incentive stock options can minimize the amount of AMT adjustments in a given year.  Taxpayers with depreciable property can elect depreciation methods that do not create large tax to AMT differences.

In all, taxpayers that are subject to the AMT can contact their tax preparer and run a projection before year-end to see what impact the AMT could have on their situation, and what measures can be taken now in order to minimize the AMT's impact.

Stay tuned for The not-so-Alternative Minimum Tax, Part 2, which will address the AMT as it pertains to businesses.  

2013 taxes and rates

When taxpayer's see their 2013 Form 1040, they will notice a few changes to the taxes and rates from previous years.  Following is a summary of the major tax rates and taxes that will be applicable for 2013. For the purposes of this article, MFJ = married filing jointly, S = single, O = any other filing status.

Regular tax rates

Here are the tax brackets for 2013:

Tax rate	Single filers	Married filing jointly or qualifying widow/widower	Married filing separately	Head of household
10%	Up to $8,925	Up to $17,850	Up to $8,925	Up to $12,750
15%	$8,926 - $36,250	$17,851 - $72,500	$8,926- $36,250	$12,751 - $48,600
25%	$36,251 - $87,850	$72,501 - $146,400	$36,251 - $73,200	$48,601 - $125,450
28%	$87,851 - $183,250	$146,401 - $223,050	$73,201 - $111,525	$125,451 - $203,150
33%	$183,251 - $398,350	$223,051 - $398,350	$111,526 - $199,175	$203,151 - $398,350
35%	$398,351 - $400,000	$398,351 - $450,000	$199,176 - $225,000	$398,351 - $425,000
39.60%	$400,001 or more	$450,001 or more	$225,001 or more	$425,001 or more

When calculating tax using this table, taxpayers must work "up the ladder".  This means if a MFJ taxpayer has taxable income of $100,000, they will pay tax at 10% on the first $17,850, then tax at 15% on the amount between $17,851 and $72,500, and then tax at 25% on the remaining amount.  As far as water cooler conversation goes, this taxpayer is "in the 25% bracket", but that doesn't mean they pay a flat 25% on $100,000.

3.8% Medicare surtax

Taxpayers with modified adjusted gross income in excess of $250,000 MFJ / $200,000 S might find themselves completing Form 8960 with their 2013 income tax return.  Taxpayers with this level of income potentially will be subject to the 3.8% Medicare surtax on their net investment income.  Net investment income is loosely defined as all taxable interest, dividends, capital gains, rental/royalty income, and other business activities that are considered passive.  The 3.8% tax is calculated on Form 8960 and added to the taxpayer's regular tax.  For example, MFJ couple has $300,000 modified adjusted gross income that includes $1,000 of taxable dividends.  The couple will pay an additional 3.8% tax on the dividends.  The IRS has recently issued final regs on what is subject to the Medicare surtax.

Higher capital gains rates

Taxpayers with modified adjusted gross income of $400,000 S / $450,000 MFJ will see their long-term capital gains taxed at 20% instead of the 15% rate from the past several years.  This applies to both long-term capital gains and qualified dividends, but short-term capital gains will still be taxed at regular rates.

Personal exemption (PEP) and itemized deduction (Pease) phaseout

Once taxpayers reach a certain level of income, they can potentially be subject to a phaseout of allowable personal exemptions and itemized deductions, which has been discussed in a previous post.

As can be seen, there are several changes to individual tax rates, deductions, and exemptions for 2013.  With proper planning, some of these issues can be either minimized or avoided altogether.

Simplify my home office

Beginning in tax year 2013 (returns which will be filed during 2014), the IRS is offering a simplified option for the Home Office Deduction.  If the space in your house that is used exclusively for business on a regular basis is <= 300 square feet, then long gone are the days of keeping track of your cleaning, insurance, utilities and other household expenses. In previous years, the benefit of the deduction usually did not outweigh the trouble for getting together the information needed to make the calculation, especially when you have a self-employed person using a very small part of their house as an office (< 10% of the home).  The calculation also confused taxpayers because some parts of the deduction, like mortgage interest and real estate taxes, were allocated between the Schedule A Itemized Deductions and the Form 8829 Expenses for Business Use of Your Home.  Then there is the added headache of depreciation, which potentially was recaptured if you later sold the residence that housed the home office (meaning it had to be added back when you sold the house).

The simplified option is as its name implies: simple.  Take the square footage of your home office (not to exceed 300 square feet), multiply by $5, and that's your deduction.  There is no depreciation allowed and no splitting of household costs - all of your mortgage interest and real estate taxes go to the Schedule A.  Some of the characteristics of the deduction will remain the same, such as the space in the home must be exclusively used for business and the deduction cannot exceed your income from the business activity, but overall this simplified method will be much easier for some taxpayers.

It is important to note that the regular (original) option is still available, and can be beneficial to taxpayers that use a significant portion of their home exclusively for business.  The benefits of the deduction will be different for a consultant that has a 150 square foot office in their 3,000 square foot home than for a landscaper that has a 1,000 square foot garage used as a shop in a 2,500 square foot home.  It would also be beneficial for the taxpayer to do a rough calculation to see if the $5 per square foot is consistent with what they would be getting under the regular method.