The not-so-Alternative Minimum Tax, Part 2

A few days ago, this blog addressed the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) as it applies to individuals.  A little known fact is that businesses, like individuals, can be subject to the AMT.  Although the purpose is the same - assure that taxpayers with certain types of income and deduction structures pay at least a minimum amount of tax - the way in arriving at the AMT is slightly different.  This article addresses AMT as it applies to tax-paying corporations (C Corps).  It does not apply to passthrough entities such as S Corps or Partnerships, because AMT is calculated at the individual level.

Not all businesses are alike

Unlike individuals, some corporations are exempt from the AMT.  A corporation that qualifies as a "small corporation" is exempt from the AMT.  To be classified as a small corporation, the entity must:

  • Be in its first year of existence, i.e. the current tax year is the year the entity began operations, or
  • The company was treated as a small corporation for all prior tax years beginning after 1997, and
  • The company's gross receipts did not exceed an average of $7.5 million for the preceding 3 tax years ($5 million if the entity has been in existence for 3 years or less)

After determining that the corporation is subject to the AMT, the taxpayer will complete Form 4626 with the Form 1120.  Form 4626 is organized similar to Form 6251 for individuals.  It begins with the corporation's taxable income, and then adds back / takes away various adjustments and preferences, such as:

  • Differences in depreciation
  • Differences in gains and losses
  • Depletion
  • Intangible drilling costs
  • Adjusted Current Earnings adjustments (ACE)

After the corporation accounts for these adjustments and preferences, they arrive at their alternative minimum taxable income (AMTI).  Corporations are afforded an exemption if their income falls in a certain range, typically $40,000.  The AMTI is then multiplied by 20% to arrive at the AMT.

Just like individuals, if the AMT exceeds the corporation's regular tax, then they must pay the higher amount.

Because corporation's do not receive the same preferential treatment of gains being taxed at a lower rate like individuals, the biggest factor in a corporation's AMT calculation is depreciation.  A corporation needs to be mindful when capitalizing depreciable property that a large difference between the tax and AMT depreciation methods could subject the corporation to a higher tax rate.  Some assets, when capitalized using the 200% double-declining method of depreciation can only be depreciated using the 150% MACRS method for AMT purposes.  This will cause the AMT depreciation expense to be lower than the tax depreciation, resulting in an addition to taxable income in arriving at AMTI.

Bonus

One of the better moves made by Congress at the end of 2012 was to extend the 50% bonus depreciation allowance to 2013. This is a great resource for businesses, but is often confused with its less beneficial counterpart, the Section 179 depreciation allowance. Bonus depreciation allows a business to expense 50% of the original cost (depreciable basis) of a qualified asset in the year of acquisition. The taxpayer can then take normal depreciation on the remaining 50%, beginning in the first year. For example, if a business buys a $5,000 piece of equipment, they can expense $2,500 in the first year plus the normal depreciation on the remaining $2,500. This is why it's called "bonus" depreciation - because you get your normal depreciation, plus a "bonus" of 50%.

Bonus depreciation has benefits that make it more useful than Section 179 in some cases. There is no income limitation, which means a business is eligible to take advantage of bonus depreciation no matter their level of income (or even loss). As a matter of fact, bonus is considered to be automatic, and the taxpayer actually has to elect not to take it. Bonus is also elected by "class life" instead of by specific asset.

Bonus can be helpful because, unlike Section 179, it can be used to reduce taxable income below zero. Using bonus to create a loss can be an especially helpful planning tool for 2013. With the 50% special bonus depreciation allowance slated to go away in 2014, a taxpayer can take advantage of the special allowance in 2013 by making as many planned PP&E acquisitions as possible. By utilizing bonus depreciation, the taxpayer can push their company into a loss for 2013, and the net operating loss (NOL) can be carried forward to 2014 (and future years) and used to offset ordinary income.

In some cases, electing out of bonus is a better decision for a business. For businesses that do not turn over PPE very often and count on depreciation each year to keep their taxable income down, bonus might not be ideal. It will provide a 50% write-off in year one, but the depreciation expense in each subsequent year will be significantly lower. Also, some states (such as my state of Arkansas) do not conform to the same rules as the IRS, which can create a Federal to State difference in depreciation. Although this is not a reason in itself to elect out of bonus, it does require the taxpayer to keep a record of the Fed to State difference in future years.

Thanks to my colleague for suggesting this topic. Have something you want to hear about? Email me.