One of the better moves made by Congress at the end of 2012 was to extend the 50% bonus depreciation allowance to 2013. This is a great resource for businesses, but is often confused with its less beneficial counterpart, the Section 179 depreciation allowance. Bonus depreciation allows a business to expense 50% of the original cost (depreciable basis) of a qualified asset in the year of acquisition. The taxpayer can then take normal depreciation on the remaining 50%, beginning in the first year. For example, if a business buys a $5,000 piece of equipment, they can expense $2,500 in the first year plus the normal depreciation on the remaining $2,500. This is why it's called "bonus" depreciation - because you get your normal depreciation, plus a "bonus" of 50%.
Bonus depreciation has benefits that make it more useful than Section 179 in some cases. There is no income limitation, which means a business is eligible to take advantage of bonus depreciation no matter their level of income (or even loss). As a matter of fact, bonus is considered to be automatic, and the taxpayer actually has to elect not to take it. Bonus is also elected by "class life" instead of by specific asset.
Bonus can be helpful because, unlike Section 179, it can be used to reduce taxable income below zero. Using bonus to create a loss can be an especially helpful planning tool for 2013. With the 50% special bonus depreciation allowance slated to go away in 2014, a taxpayer can take advantage of the special allowance in 2013 by making as many planned PP&E acquisitions as possible. By utilizing bonus depreciation, the taxpayer can push their company into a loss for 2013, and the net operating loss (NOL) can be carried forward to 2014 (and future years) and used to offset ordinary income.
In some cases, electing out of bonus is a better decision for a business. For businesses that do not turn over PPE very often and count on depreciation each year to keep their taxable income down, bonus might not be ideal. It will provide a 50% write-off in year one, but the depreciation expense in each subsequent year will be significantly lower. Also, some states (such as my state of Arkansas) do not conform to the same rules as the IRS, which can create a Federal to State difference in depreciation. Although this is not a reason in itself to elect out of bonus, it does require the taxpayer to keep a record of the Fed to State difference in future years.
Thanks to my colleague for suggesting this topic. Have something you want to hear about? Email me.